President Bola Tinubu has been slammed by the family of Nnamdi Kanu, the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
The family criticized President Bola Tinubu for allegedly failing to honor an agreement reportedly made between his son, Seyi Tinubu, and the Kanu family regarding Nnamdi Kanu’s release.
According to reports, Kanu’s younger brother, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, issued a statement on Thursday alleging that he and Seyi Tinubu reached an agreement shortly before the 2023 general election.
He claimed that during a meeting in Abuja, approved by President Tinubu, it was agreed that IPOB would not boycott the election in exchange for a promise that Nnamdi Kanu would be released after Tinubu assumed office.
Prince Emmanuel expressed disappointment that nearly two years into Tinubu’s presidency, his brother remains in detention despite Justice Binta Nyako, the presiding judge, recusing herself from the case.
He described the situation as disgraceful, stating, “It is shameful that those who claim to be honorable have failed to uphold their word.”
The statement read: “Before the last election, I received a message from an ex-governor that Seyi the son of President Tinubu wanted to see me. I agreed to meet with him on the condition that the overriding priority and hence the fulcrum of our discussion will be the release of my brother. The meeting was held in Abuja in the presence of another individual whom I asked along to witness the deliberations and if need be provide independent verification should the need arise.
“Seyi confirmed to me that his father sanctioned the meeting and that I should consider any agreement we reach as binding on the then candidate Senator Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
“In good faith we agreed that I shall relay the outcome to my brother to reinforce the long held tradition of IPOB not interfering with the conduct of elections, either through boycott or any other form of civil disobedience. This understanding was duly communicated to my brother and he reaffirmed his commitment not to stop the elections or order any boycott.
“When President Tinubu as a candidate visited Owerri during his campaign, he too reiterated his commitment to facilitate the release of my brother if elected. We took his public statement as a tacit reaffirmation of the understanding I reached with his son Seyi.
At the end, IPOB did not call for election boycott despite having the capacity to do so. IPOB also made sure that discordant voices urging election boycott were overcome because election boycotts would not reflect well on the reputation of a global movement that prides itself on adherence to democratic tenets.
“It therefore, defies logic that nearly two years after President Tinubu assumed the mantle of leadership in Nigeria, my brother is still in detention despite not having any charge against him. It’s been over three months now that Justice Binta Nyako recused herself from the case yet no new judge has been assigned the case.
“This is on top of the fact that Appeal Court had earlier discharged him of the sham charges and ordered his release which the previous regime of Buhari declined to obey.
“Supreme Court determination that his bail ought not to have been revoked has been ignored by the courts and the government. The latest insult is that Abuja courts of all persuasion are no longer willing to determine the case of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu on merit but are rather relying on ludicrous and inapplicable technicalities to stall the timely determination of his cases.
“The truth is that Nigerian courts cannot, will not and do not have both the substantive and procedural jurisdiction to try him. His detention Is without the backing of any known law in Nigeria or elsewhere in the world.
“It’s a shame that those who claim to be men of honour cannot honour their word.”
