• About
  • Advertise
  • Our Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Thursday, June 12, 2025
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Register
MetrowatchXtra
  • WORLD
  • BUSINESS
  • POLITICS
  • HEALTH
  • SPORTS
  • OP-ED
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • WORLD
  • BUSINESS
  • POLITICS
  • HEALTH
  • SPORTS
  • OP-ED
  • ENTERTAINMENT
No Result
View All Result
MetrowatchXtra
No Result
View All Result
Home OP-ED

The Risk Ahead: Why the Natasha Case Could Also Be Heard in American Courts, By John Egbeazien Oshodi

The reality is that domestic legal procedures that appear unjust, retaliatory, or gendered in tone can quickly evolve into transnational matters, especially when digital communications and U.S.-based actors are involved

Kemi Sheriepha by Kemi Sheriepha
May 23, 2025
0 0
0

This is a moment where discretion must take the place of legal overconfidence. While the Federal Government’s criminal defamation case against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan may appear to be strictly a domestic legal affair, it now casts a growing international shadow. It is a case that, due to its complexity and context, risks attracting scrutiny beyond Nigeria’s borders.

This writer has no interest in partisanship or political validation. I do not endorse Senator Natasha’s political style, statements, or strategy. I do, however, offer this as a free counsel—especially to the Attorney General of the Federation, Mr. Lateef Fagbemi.

The handling of this case could set off unintended global legal consequences, particularly in the United States, where legal systems are highly responsive to cross-border allegations involving civil liberties, gender equity, and institutional integrity. We are no longer in a world where internal actions remain internal.

The reality is that domestic legal procedures that appear unjust, retaliatory, or gendered in tone can quickly evolve into transnational matters, especially when digital communications and U.S.-based actors are involved.

When a Plea for Investigation Is Met With Prosecution

It must be emphasized that Senator Natasha made several public appeals—not in whispers, not behind closed doors, but in full view of the nation and the world. She asked for protection. She asked for investigation. She called on the Nigerian Government, the Inspector General of Police, and the Attorney General to examine her claims of harassment, threats, and reputational targeting. These appeals were not only public—they were consistent. Yet, there is no record of meaningful institutional follow-up. There was no neutral inquiry panel, no public fact-finding committee, no protective mechanism publicly announced. What followed was a suspension from the Senate, prolonged silence from key state bodies, and eventually a state-backed prosecution. From an internal political view, this might seem routine or manageable. But in a wider, international legal context—especially in the eyes of courts in democratic societies—this can be read as an attempt to punish, not to listen. It creates a narrative that institutions shield the powerful and isolate the accuser.

What Happens If This Case Is Filed in a U.S. Court?

This brings us to the core of the growing international concern: the active involvement of Sandra Duru, also known as Prof. Mgbeke, a figure who resides in the United States.

READ ALSO  OPINION | Tinubu, Nigeria and the Fuel Subsidy Albatross, By Temitope Ajayi | METROWATCH

Her connection to this case introduces not just a geographic dimension, but also a legal one that could extend into the American judicial system. Duru has been publicly accused of leading a digital campaign that targeted Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

Allegations include orchestrating a cyber smear effort, seeking payment in exchange for narrative control, and releasing sensitive information—most notably, during a livestream where she reportedly exposed the private phone number of Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

In the Nigerian context, these actions might incite online controversy and be absorbed into political discourse. However, in the United States, the legal interpretation is different. In the U.S. judicial framework, digital communications of this nature—livestreams, screenshots, voice messages, transaction records—are not treated casually.

They are considered potential legal evidence. If elements of the harassment or reputational damage campaign can be traced to U.S. soil or if digital platforms headquartered in the U.S. were used to disseminate the harmful content, then this matter could rightfully fall under the jurisdiction of American courts.

This potential legal reach becomes even more pressing when we consider recent developments surrounding a Nigerian journalist and media activist, Maazi Obinna Oparaku Akuwudike. He was arrested by police in Imo State after giving an interview on Adeola Fayehun’s U.S.-based YouTube channel. In the interview, Obinna claimed that Sandra Duru had paid him to produce content aimed at damaging Senator Natasha’s reputation.

He initially took the assignment believing it was a legitimate media contract, but later grew uncomfortable after noticing inconsistencies in Duru’s narrative. His eventual disclosure of the campaign—and the subsequent arrest—has further drawn public attention to the roles being played behind the scenes.

The implication here is significant. A whistleblower, having participated in and then withdrawn from what he describes as a coordinated smear campaign, gave his testimony on a global platform hosted in the United States.

That interview now lives in the public domain, creating a digital trail accessible to international observers, legal experts, and possibly even American attorneys. If the case is perceived as involving cross-border psychological harm, manipulation, or cyber harassment, then the likelihood of it drawing interest or action fromAmerican legal institutions increases. And this is precisely why this case must be approached with care: once a foreign jurisdiction begins to consider the facts, the matter could evolve beyond the control of Nigerian institutions.

READ ALSO  INSIGHT | Democratic Rascality and a People Awoke, By Tony Osakpamwan Agbons

Should Natasha, or even a third-party legal or advocacy group acting on her behalf, choose to pursue a civil case in the United States—particularly on the grounds of defamation, digital harassment, or psychological harm arising from cross-border activities—then the issue takes on a whole new life. The jurisdictional threshold is surprisingly low in such matters. It does not matter whether the bulk of the public impact was felt in Nigeria. What matters is where the digital activity was initiated, who the actors were, and whether American systems, platforms, or territory were part of the chain of events. And once activated, U.S. courts do not entertain political interference. They do not recognize status as a shield. They deal in evidence, timeline, consistency, and the protection of individual rights.

shift to more transparent and rigorous expectations. If that moment comes, it may not be reversible.

Let it not be said that those entrusted with our legal institutions were not warned. Let it instead be said that they paused, reflected, and recalibrated—choosing the path of fairness and credibility over political expedience.

This writer does not know any of the individuals involved; the focus is solely on upholding democracy, truth, and justice.

 

ABOUT AUTHOR

Professor John Egbeazien Oshodi is an American psychologist, educator, and author specializing in forensic, legal, and clinical psychology, cross-cultural psychology, police and prison sciences, and community justice. Born in Uromi, Edo State, Nigeria, he is the son of a 37-year veteran of the Nigeria Police Force—an experience that shaped his enduring commitment to justice, security, and psychological reform.

 

Metrowatchxtra

Tags: Natasha Akpoti Uduaghan
Kemi Sheriepha

Kemi Sheriepha

RELATED POST

OPINION | Akpabio Vs Akpoti-Uduaghan: Setting the Record Straight on Appeal Court Ruling, By Monday Ubani
JUDICIARY

OPINION | Akpabio Vs Akpoti-Uduaghan: Setting the Record Straight on Appeal Court Ruling, By Monday Ubani

by MetrowatchXtra
June 12, 2025
0

When I saw the recycled news from some bloggers and news outlets, I felt I need to offer a succinct...

Read moreDetails
Natasha: Court Summons Akpabio, Nwaebonyi Over S*xual Har@ssment, Defamation Claims

Natasha: Court Summons Akpabio, Nwaebonyi Over S*xual Har@ssment, Defamation Claims

June 5, 2025
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Shuns Kogi Governor’s Ban, Insists on Sallah Visit Tuesday

Defamation: Senator Natasha Akpoti to Appear in Court on Tuesday

June 2, 2025
Suspension: Liberian Lawmaker Makes Case for Natasha at ECOWAS Parliament 

Suspension: Liberian Lawmaker Makes Case for Natasha at ECOWAS Parliament 

May 29, 2025
JUST IN: Senate Dismisses Natasha’s Petition as Invalid

Sexual Harassment: Why I won’t Withdraw Suit Against Akpabio, Natasha Writes Agbakoba

May 1, 2025
Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Shuns Kogi Governor’s Ban, Insists on Sallah Visit Tuesday

Police Investigate Alleged Attack on Senator Natasha’s Family House

April 19, 2025
Load More

APO

Recent Posts

  • It Gives Me Pleasure to Witness You in Disarray, Tinubu Mocks Opposition Parties
  • Tinubu Confers National Honour on Yar’Adua, Kudirat Abiola, Others (See Full List)
  • FULL TEXT : Tinubu’s Address at Joint National Assembly Session on Democracy Day
  • Defections: APC Can’t be Blamed for Bailing People Out of Sinking Ship, Tinubu Says
  • Tinubu Arrives National Assembly for Democracy Day Address

Recommended

‘No Evidence, You Go Explain Tire’, Burna Boy’s Popular Saying Appears in UNIUYO Exam Question | METROWATCH

‘No Evidence, You Go Explain Tire’, Burna Boy’s Popular Saying Appears in UNIUYO Exam Question | METROWATCH

2 years ago
OPINION | The Emerging Judiciary,  By Hon. Josef Omorotionmwan | METROWATCH

Court to Rule on Bail for Rivers Assembly’s Suspected Arsonists | METROWATCH

1 year ago
MetrowatchXtra

MetrowatchXtra is an online daily newspaper poised to act as a catalyst in our debate and desire for well-governed Nigeria and provide the much-needed platform for all, irrespective of social, religious or political divide, to express their views.
Metrowatchxtra Nigeria

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Our Privacy Policy
  • Contact

© 2024 Metrowatchxtra Nigeria Published by Miraculous Media Connect Limited. All rights reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Politics
  • World
  • Business
  • Science
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Tech
  • Health

© 2024 Metrowatchxtra Nigeria Published by Miraculous Media Connect Limited. All rights reserved